Page 4 of 6

Re: Rope for various lines

PostPosted: Tue Aug 22, 2017 12:59 pm
by GreenLake
Here's my variant of a sheet bend with extra loop.

Re: Rope for various lines

PostPosted: Tue Aug 22, 2017 6:16 pm
by talbot
The blue line in the blocks might be 6mm Marlow 8-Plait-Matt.

I have started buying rope in scrap ends from our boatyard. Inexpensive, but sometimes you have to do some detective work to know what you are getting if the scrap isn't something the yard ordered. It's particularly tricky when you have a jacketed line that doesn't weigh much. It might be polypro; it might be Dyneema. In any case, the cover may be different from the core. You have to look for distinctive jacket colors or get the boatyard to let you dissect the end of the scrap. Sometimes it's impossible. Once it's off the spool, I have no idea how to tell the difference between first-generation gray Dyneema and the latest SK-99. (It doesn't make a difference on control lines, but I'm considering replacing all the wire on our cabin sloop (stays, shrouds, lifelines) with fiber.)
--Talbot

Re: Rope for various lines

PostPosted: Wed Aug 23, 2017 2:43 am
by GreenLake
I totally get the pleasure of "making do".

The rope I use for my jib sheets was a "cutoff" I couldn't resist. The rope ended up having just the right length for the purpose, and it handles reasonably well, but it's unnecessarily bulky and heavy. The DS is not not a lightweight, so a few extra ounces doesn't affect the boat weight so much, as it's hanging off the jib in light airs, distorting it. Would do something different today, but don't feel like swapping out what I got.

Most ropes are ridiculously oversized because the minimal size for the purpose is too small to be handled. Halyards and similar lines can be sized to the load, and, with modern rope, slimmed down without loss of usability. That's where scrounging becomes a challenge.

However, for mission-critical applications where it's not possible to oversize (like standing rigging) I would rather purchase by spec.

Re: Rope for various lines

PostPosted: Wed Aug 23, 2017 2:48 am
by GreenLake
talbot wrote:The blue line in the blocks might be 6mm Marlow 8-Plait-Matt.


2328

Very plausible. The store I purchased the original has change their assortment of ropes over time, so I couldn't fit it again in their online catalog. But if not the exact match, it looks like it's at least a close match for what I got. 4mm would seem to be the size.

Re: Rope for various lines

PostPosted: Wed Aug 23, 2017 12:08 pm
by talbot
4mm? As in 5/32"? You must have hands like steel.
If it's the Marlow polyester line, the breaking strength is only 240kg/529lbs. Even assuming I could grip the line, I would want a bit more strength to account for safe working load and the effects of knots and wear.

Re: Rope for various lines

PostPosted: Thu Aug 24, 2017 2:25 am
by GreenLake
We are talking about the vang? The blue line is in a 6:1 purchase. That is, the force on the line is 1/6th of the force applied to the orange line. The orange line is a 2:1 cascade, so the force on the boom is 2 times the force on the orange line, or 12 times the force on the blue line.

For a short pull, I can manage 40 pounds even on a 4mm line. Usually, I think I pull at most 10-20lbs when I adjust the vang. Say, 50 lbs is the absolute ceiling. Then, the force I apply to the line is 50, the orange line sees 300 (it's 3/16th) and the boom sees 600.

In my estimate, the weakest link is the SS strap on the boom. All the ropes are within spec (for reference, the orange line is Samson ultra-lite, and per their specs it rates 1200 lbs, or 600 after things like knots. They don't say whether they list breaking strength or SWL, so I assume the former. I estimate it gets loaded to 300 at most, which would leave a factor 2).

At 14knots wind pressure is about 1lb/sqft. With a typical DS main, the total wind force on the main should be 100lbs, (factor 4 or) 400lbs if it gusts to 28knots (factor 2). Somewhere along this curve, you end up exceeding the righting force from the crew hiking - that force is the maximum load on the sail because after that, you capsize.

With a beam of 6', and crew weight (fully equipped) of 400lbs, you can get 4' x 400lbs or 1600 lbft. Assume center of effort of the sail at 10', and you can hold a sail force of 160 lbs! I think the actual number is a bit higher, because the boat, when heeling, doesn't do that around its centerline, but I don't think the distance between center of buoyancy and center of mass ever gets to be much larger than 5'. In that case you can hold 200lbs of sail force.

772

Because of vang location and angle, the vang takes higher forces than the main sheet. You loose about 50% from the angle, and another 50% from the distance, so your vang needs to pull 4 times as hard as your mainsheet, assuming center boom sheeting. With a 4:1 mainsheet, pulling 35bs on the free end would get you 150lbs of pull on the center of the boom. With that estimate, you get the same pull on the boom, as with 600 lbs of vang tension (accounting for the fact that the main sheet and vang don't pull in the same direction (it pulls in and down), you need to pull a bit harder on the main to get the boom equally far down, so now you get to 40~45 lbs on the main sheet.

Unlike a vang, you'd hold that continuously, and that's where ratchet blocks come in :)

I don't get to sail my DS at the upper end of the wind range often enough, but I know I can manage to hold the mainsheet in hand when it blows into the 20's. But I use 3/8" and a ratchet block.

So running all these numbers, the vang strength should be just about adequate for the extreme case where the entire sail force counterbalancing the maximally hiking crew is held by the vang only. (In reality, the jib takes a good share).

Let me know if you spot any flaws in the reasoning so far.

Re: Rope for various lines

PostPosted: Thu Aug 24, 2017 2:20 pm
by talbot
Nice analysis. Along the way, It helps explain why a lot of cruisers like the larger O'Days use stern sheeting, because it allows them to handle larger sails with minimal rigging by pulling from the end of the boom. (Or lets you handle the DS main with less than 4:1 purchase.)

As for the size of the vang line, I accept that it's unlikely to fail. I just like my 6mm or 7mm line for its grip.

Re: Rope for various lines

PostPosted: Thu Aug 24, 2017 4:43 pm
by GreenLake
That Marlow rope is easy to get a grip on (not slippery).

While I understand that for jib and mainsheet there is a good reason to size them for their feel in the hand, I think that same is not true for most of the other lines on the boat, and there's an unexamined tendency to oversize them needlessly.

Maybe I'm doing it wrong, but I don't adjust my vang at every gust. I'm also not immune to this oversizing tendency, case it point are the lines I use for the jib-sheet inhaul. They pull at right angles to the sheet, so their max load is, what, 1/10th of the load on the sheet; I think used 1/4", 1/8th or 3mm would have been sufficient with no loss in terms of sufficient working load or ability to adjust them.

I bought a 15' dinghy off someone who had rigged it with 3mm for the halyards. Dyneema/spectra core, so not stretchy, and a grippy cover, so no need for tails. Totally no problem, although it looks like a gossamer thread that should fail at any moment :)

Re: Rope for various lines

PostPosted: Thu Apr 18, 2019 4:36 pm
by GreenLake
looking through this thread, I can't find whether I made mention of replacing my jib and main halyards by Dyneema (with spliced on braided line tails for handling). The instructions for that are on L36.com. I thought I had discussed that in more detail somewhere, if I can find it (or find the earlier post that I thought should have been in this thread, I'll post a link here).

UPDATE: looks like I discussed that project at length in some other thread. I've collected some relevant info and appended it to this thread.

Re: Rope for various lines

PostPosted: Wed Nov 13, 2019 7:29 pm
by GreenLake
Not much has happened in the last two seasons, however, I have rigged a 2:1 jib halyard tensioner. That one uses a Prusik loop made from 3/16" Amsteel and the thinnest line I have on board for the 2:1 purchase part. More when I locate a photo.

Re: Rope for various lines

PostPosted: Thu Nov 14, 2019 10:14 am
by K.C. Walker
I would be interested to see a photo when you locate one. I have a jib halyard tensioner that I rigged when I had a wire halyard for the jib. It hooked into the loop end of the wire. When I replaced that with Amsteel it became more difficult to engage (and more importantly disengage) because the loop in the Amsteel closes tight under halyard tension. Therefore, I haven't used it for a while now. And… It would be good to have on higher wind days.

Unfortunately, the sailing season has come to an end here. We have been "Frostbiting" through the mild fall, but last Saturday it was 15° in the morning and 34° at race time. Only the hard-core laser sailors showed up.

Re: Rope for various lines

PostPosted: Thu Nov 14, 2019 2:50 pm
by GreenLake
K.C., I looked and I already had added the photo to my gallery:

2679

The design was based on the idea of having a setup that is quick to connect, as I trailer and rig/de-rig my boat weekly. A Prusik loop connects to the jib halyard and the floating block of the 2:1 purchase has a simple hook. Originally, the idea behind the Prusik loop was to be able to slide it along the halyard, so the forward end would still reach the deck. However, it's a bit too slippery and won't stay put - unless I position it at the place where I have the splice going from Amsteel to the braided tail. Works fine, but I could have used a butterfly knot in the halyard for the same effect. (Different diameter / material for the Prusik loop might also have made it more grippy).

The line for the purchase is something like 2mm. According to Harken, that's the minimum rated size for their cam cleat (not shown at the edge of the cuddy). I'm planning on going up to 3mm (~1/8"); I need to swap this out anyway, because it ended up too short (was measured for a different position of the Prusik loop).

The fairlead the standing end is tied to was already in place and free, otherwise I would have placed it closer to the mast.

The way this works is that I hoist the jib and belay the halyard as before. Then I hook the purchase into the Prusik loop and can then add more tension as needed. All the while, the halyard is secure and if I accidentally release the tensioner, the sail stays up.

Re: Rope for various lines

PostPosted: Thu Nov 14, 2019 6:34 pm
by K.C. Walker
Thanks for the photo. That's clever and looks like it works perfectly. Unfortunately, I'm rigged differently and I can't quite see how I would be able to use it. I've got Amsteel that I pull all the way through the turning block at the base of my mast and then come out to a cleat on the cuddy top with a tail. I've got a loop of Amsteel threaded through the old triple twisted original halyard. Maybe if I make my hook a bit more pointy I could slip it in the loop easier. Your hook appears smaller than mine, maybe that's also something to look into. Thanks for getting back to me!

Re: Rope for various lines

PostPosted: Thu Nov 14, 2019 6:51 pm
by talbot
KC: Maybe I'm unclear on the rig, but I don't see why the Prusik wouldn't work with your setup. The Prusik can grab the halyard at any point between the jib and the belay point. Shouldn't matter how the halyard belays, as long as the Prusik has a place to turn and belay--such as the original DS mast cleat.

From climbing, I know that the Prusik should be no more than 2/3 the diameter of the line it is grabbing, and a kernmantel line works best (maybe North America Spyderline, 5/32 on a 1/4 halyard).
--Talbot

Re: Rope for various lines

PostPosted: Thu Nov 14, 2019 8:11 pm
by GreenLake
Mine ended up closer to 1:1 for the diameters. Good point about being able to place the tensioner anywhere along the halyard. The block I'm using is a Ronstan RF 15180, which is 15mm. If there's any knot/eye in the halyard already, the hook can be attached there. It's right around 1/8" diameter, so it doesn't need a big opening.